Jf. Tait et J. Revenaugh, SOURCE-TRANSPORT INVERSION - AN APPLICATION OF GEOPHYSICAL INVERSE-THEORY TO SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IN MONTEREY BAY, CALIFORNIA, J GEO RES-O, 103(C1), 1998, pp. 1275-1283
Application of forward coastal sediment transport models in situations
involving large temporal and spatial scales or topographically comple
x environments can be highly problematic since the distribution of hyd
rodynamic parameters is rarely adequately known. Where rocky topograph
y is present, flow patterns may be altered and sediments trapped by to
pographic barriers. A frequently employed approach to these problems i
s the application of the statistical technique known as empirical orth
ogonal function (EOF) analysis. One limitation of EOF analysis of grai
n size and mineralogical data is that EOF is a purely geometric techni
que which does not allow incorporation of a priori knowledge we may ha
ve regarding the physical environment. In fact, there is no guarantee
that a meaningful physical interpretation of the results of an EOF ana
lysis actually exists. This is not true of geophysical inverse theory,
which is capable of incorporating diverse forms of information and is
not limited to purely geometric manipulations of data. We have formul
ated an inverse theoretical approach to study sediment transport which
we call STI, short for source-transport inversion. STI relaxes the no
nphysical assumption of orthogonal end-members and can handle many for
ms of a priori information. STI has been developed initially in the co
ntext of modeling the sediment supply and dispersal system of Monterey
Bay, California. Using the geographical distribution of heavy mineral
ogy data, significant sources are identified and sediments traced from
those sources along transport pathways. Model results are encouraging
both in terms of goodness of fit between model and data and in terms
of the agreement of model results with the sediment sourcing and dispe
rsal patterns inferred in previous studies. Model results indicate tha
t beach sediments are primarily derived from the open coast north of t
he bay, that a littoral cell boundary exists in the center of the bay
at Moss Landing, and that beach deposits produced by paleolittoral dri
ft during a sea level low stand lie along the 100-m isobath.