C. Baudouin et C. Delunardo, SHORT-TERM COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF TOPICAL 2-PERCENT CARTEOLOL WITH AND WITHOUT BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE IN HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS, British journal of ophthalmology, 82(1), 1998, pp. 39-42
Aim-A crossover, randomised double blind study was undertaken in 30 he
althy volunteers, in order to compare the tolerance of 2% carteolol wi
th and without preservative in short term use. Methods-Complete ophtha
lmic examinations were performed before and 30, 60, and 180 minutes af
ter instillation of one drop of the solution, and after 3 days of pres
ervative treatment. After a 5 day washout, the same examinations were
done with the second drug. Results-Results showed good general toleran
ce for both formulations. No significant difference in subjective tole
rance, corneal aesthesiometry, punctuate keratitis, Schirmer's test, i
ntraocular pressure (IOP) decrease (about 25% in the two groups at 3 h
ours, 10% after 3 days of treatment), resting cardiac frequency, or bl
ood pressure was observed. However, break up time was I;significantly
reduced from baseline by preserved carteolol both at 3 hours (10.40 (5
.9) seconds to 6.15 (3.9:) seconds, p=0.001) and after 3 days (7.72 (5
.5) seconds, p=0.04). Preservative free carteolol did not significantl
y change the break up time (baseline 9.08 (5.7) seconds; 3 hours = 7.8
8 (5.5) seconds, not significant; day 3 = 8.35 (5.8), non-significant)
. Conclusions-These results confirm that carteolol is well tolerated,
either with or without preservative. The preservative free group showe
d better stability of the tear film, without Ic,ss of effect This diff
erence, although healthy young subjects in the present study could be
much more relevant ill those patients treated long term, older patient
s, and/or those suffering from ocular surface disorders. In such insta
nces, preservative free drugs could be of potential benefit to protect
the lacrimal fluid integrity and corneoconjunctival surface.