Gs. Stergiou et al., HOME SELF-MONITORING OF BLOOD-PRESSURE - IS FULLY AUTOMATED OSCILLOMETRIC TECHNIQUE AS GOOD AS CONVENTIONAL STETHOSCOPIC TECHNIQUE, American journal of hypertension, 10(4), 1997, pp. 428-433
Home blood pressure (HBP) measurement is becoming increasingly popular
as an additional source of information for the practicing physician.
Whether HBP measured with a fully automated oscillometric device (oHBP
) is more reliable than HBP measured with an aneroid sphygmomanometer
and a stethoscope (sHBP) remains unclear. We compared sHBP with oHBP u
sing as a reference method daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), as
this is believed to be a better index of an individual's overall leve
l of pressure. Forty-six hypertensive patients measuring HBP with aner
oid devices were retrained by a standard 30 min protocol that included
training in the technique of measurement, checking patients' devices,
and testing patients' performance in stethoscopic measurement. Patien
ts were randomized to measure for 2 weeks either sHBP using their own
calibrated aneroid devices or oHBP using a validated fully automated o
scillometric device (Omron HEM-705CP). Then 24 h ABP monitoring was pe
rformed (SpaceLabs 90207) and patients crossed over for a second 2 wee
k period by using the alternative HBP measurement technique. Mean sHBP
was not different from mean oHBP, and there was a close correlation b
etween them (r = 0.82/0.76 for systolic/diastolic BP, P <.001). Daytim
e ABP was not different from oHBP or sHBP and was closely related to b
oth of them (oHBP, r = 0.59/0.72 systolic/diastolic BP, P <.001; sHBP,
0.50/0.65, P <.001). Age was significantly related with diastolic ABP
-sHBP difference (r = 0.33, P <.05). These results suggest that HBP me
asured with validated fully automated oscillometric devices is equally
reliable in predicting average ABP as that measured with calibrated a
neroid sphygmomanometers used by very carefully trained patients. In c
linical practice, HBP monitoring by using reliable automated devices i
s probably more feasible than to achieve a high standard of stethoscop
ic HBP measuring technique. (C) 1997 American Journal of Hypertension,
Ltd.