Gb. Green et al., USE OF TROPONIN-T AND CREATINE KINASE-MB SUBUNIT LEVELS FOR RISK STRATIFICATION OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS WITH POSSIBLE MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA, Annals of emergency medicine, 31(1), 1998, pp. 19-29
Study Objectives: To evaluate and compare the utility of measurement o
f troponin T and the creatine kinase MB subunit (OK-MB) for risk strat
ification of ED patients with possible myocardial ischemia. Methods: P
rospective observational study of ED patients with symptoms of possibl
e myocardial ischemia with early, single sample serologic testing for
cardiac troponin T and CK-MB using an identity-unlinked process. Chart
review (ED, inpatient, outpatient), and telephone and mail surveys id
entified adverse events (AEs) during the 14 days following enrollment.
AEs recorded included death, respiratory or cardiac arrest, myocardia
l infarction (MI), atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, pulmonary edema
, conduction disturbances, and recurrent angina. Measures of the predi
ctive ability for AEs were calculated for troponin T, CK-MB, and a com
bined troponin T/CK-MB index (defined as positive if either troponin T
or CK-MB levels exceeded threshold values). Results: Among 292 study
patients, 45 (15.4%) experienced al least one AE, including seven deat
hs and 12 Mis. The troponin T result was positive in 34 patients, and
the CK-MB result was positive in 15 patients; 6 patients had positive
results for both markers and 43 patients had a positive combined tropo
nin T/CK-MB index. Odds ratios (ORs) for occurrence of AEs among all p
atients were 4.4(1.8 to 10.2), 10.0 (3.0 to 36.0), and 4.5 (2.0 to 9.8
) for troponin T, CK-MB, and the troponin T/CK-MB index, respectively.
Both markers were individually predictive of AEs (troponin T=4.3; CK-
MB=7.5) among all those with chest pain. Only the CK-MB level was sign
ificantly predictive of AEs among those presenting with symptoms other
than chest pain (OR=24.3 [1.1, 1448]), whereas only the troponin T le
vel was significantly predictive among patients representing a disposi
tion dilemma for the emergency physician (OR=5.7 [1.4, 20.7]). When co
mpared, the ORs for troponin T and CK-MB were not significantly differ
ent for any patient subgroup. The troponin T/CK-MB index did not have
a higher prognostic value than either troponin T or CK-MB alone in any
subgroup studied. Conclusion: A positive test result for either tropo
nin T or CK-MB in the ED successfully identified patients at significa
ntly higher risk of adverse events during the 2 weeks following their
ED visit. The two markers may complement each other in that each appea
rs to have prognostic ability among a unique patient subgroup. ED mark
er measurement can provide useful prognostic information for patients
with a broad spectrum of presentations consistent with possible myocar
dial ischemia.