Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the interobserver
reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the AO/ASIF and Ruedi
and Allgower classifications for fractures of the distal tibia, and t
o determine the benefit of a computed tomography (CT) scan and experie
nce on observer agreement for several fracture characteristics, includ
ing classification. Methods: The radiographs of forty-three fractures
of the distal tibia, fourteen of which had CT scans, were assessed by
groups of experienced and less-experienced observers. Each case was cl
assified according to the AO/ASIF and Ruedi and Allgower systems. Seve
ral other fracture characteristics also were assessed. The kappa coeff
icient of agreement was calculated and used to compare the interobserv
er reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the classification
systems and to determine the benefit of experience and CT scans. The
intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess noncategoric dat
a. Results: Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were good when
classifying fractures into AO/ASIF types and significantly better than
that for the Ruedi and Allgower system. However, agreement was poor w
hen classifying the fractures into AO/ASIF groups. For most assessment
s, the experienced group tended to have higher levels of interobserver
agreement, but not intraobserver agreement. Viewing the CT scans impr
oved agreement on the percentage of articular surface involved, but it
did not improve interobserver reliability or intraobserver reproducib
ility for either of the classification systems. Conclusion: The AO/ASI
F classification for fractures of the distal tibia has good observer a
greement at the type level, but poor agreement at the group level. Exp
erience tends to improve interobserver agreement, but not intraobserve
r agreement. Viewing CT scans does not improve agreement on classifica
tion, but it tends to improve agreement on articular surface involveme
nt.