Me. Lassaline et Gl. Murphy, ALIGNMENT AND CATEGORY LEARNING, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 24(1), 1998, pp. 144-160
Recent research shows that similarity comparisons involve an alignment
process in which features are placed into correspondence. In 6 studie
s, the authors showed that alignment is involved in category learning
as well. Within a category, aligned matches (feature matches occurring
on the same dimension) facilitate learning more than nonaligned match
es do (matches on different dimensions), although nonaligned matches s
till facilitate learning relative to nonmatches. Analogously, feature
matches that cross category boundaries hurt learning more if they occu
r on the same versus a different dimension, and cross-category feature
matches on different dimensions hurt learning relative to nonmatching
features. Representational assumptions of category learning models mu
st be modified to account for the differences between aligned and nona
ligned feature matches.