Sj. Sydeman et al., PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN THE CONTEXT OF CIVIL COMMITMENT - A CRITIQUE OFTYLERS ANALYSIS, Psychology, public policy, and law, 3(1), 1997, pp. 207-221
This article is a critique of T. R. Tyler's 1992 review of procedural
justice and its effect on therapeutic outcome in patients involved in
civil commitment hearings. The article clarifies critical elements of
Tyler's analysis by drawing on the social cognition construct of infor
mation control and elements in the consumerism literature that may mir
ror and facilitate procedural justice effects. The importance of the c
ommitting psychiatrist's role during the commitment hearing is emphasi
zed and issues unique to civil commitment respondents that might affec
t their susceptibility to procedural justice effects are highlighted.
Further research examining the effects of judges', attorneys', and psy
chiatrists' behavior on the patient's perception of procedural justice
and subsequent therapeutic outcome is suggested.