Jq. Melo et al., WHEN AND HOW TO REPORT RESULTS OF SURGERY ON ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 12(5), 1997, pp. 739-745
Objective: Several medical, interventional and surgical techniques are
used to treat atrial fibrillation, aimed at different goals and havin
g variable success rates. To be able to assess and compare all these t
echniques a methodology of study and a classification is proposed. Met
hods: We developed a five grade score, named the Santa Crus Score, bas
ed upon the post-operative atrial rhythm and the effective atrial cont
raction. Score 0 corresponds to a persistence of atrial fibrillation,
the presence of a regular rhythm is grade 1, 2 or 3 if there is no atr
ial contraction; right atrial contraction; or bilateral atrial contrac
tion, respectively. Score 4 corresponds to sinus rhythm and bilateral
atrial contraction. Surgery for atrial fibrillation was performed on 5
1 patients since 1992. All patients but two had associated mitrial sur
gery. Three different maze techniques were performed on 17 patients an
d the pulmonary viens isolation procedure on 34 patients. Patients wer
e reassessed at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, Results: After the maze I
procedure atrial fibrillation eradication was achieved in 88% of patie
nts but none scored 4. Three patients changed score during the first y
ear. All maze III patients scored 0 initially and one changed to score
3 in the first year. Sixty percent of the maze IIIA patients scored 4
, but one evolved to score 0 at 6 months. The pulmonary veins isolatio
n technique eliminated atrial fibrillation in 71% of the patients init
ially, and in 60% after 1 year, and achieved a score of 4 in a third o
f the patients. Conclusion: This classification considers the intermed
iate grades of success that can occur with absence of atrial fibrillat
ion and is applicable to all forms of therapy. (C) 1997 Elsevier Scien
ce B.V.