TREATMENT OF TYPE-II, IIIA, AND IIIB OPEN FRACTURES OF THE TIBIAL SHAFT - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF UNREAMED INTERLOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS AND HALF-PIN EXTERNAL FIXATORS
Mb. Henley et al., TREATMENT OF TYPE-II, IIIA, AND IIIB OPEN FRACTURES OF THE TIBIAL SHAFT - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF UNREAMED INTERLOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS AND HALF-PIN EXTERNAL FIXATORS, Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 12(1), 1998, pp. 1-7
Objective: To compare unreamed intramedullary nailing (IMN) with exter
nal fixation (EF) in patients with Type IT, IIIA, and IIIB open fractu
res of the tibial shaft. Design: An inception cohort of consecutive pa
tients with Type II, IIIA, and IIIB tibial fractures incurred between
January 1988 and March 1993 were systematically allocated into one of
two treatment groups. Patients were treated and followed with a prospe
ctively designed protocol. Patients and Setting: All patients were ske
letally mature and had incurred a fracture of the tibial diaphysis wit
hin twenty-four hours of presentation to the tertiary care hospital, a
Level I Trauma Center, One hundred seventy-four fractures in 168 pati
ents were stabilized with either IMN (104) or half-pin EF (70). There
were 132 men and thirty-six women, with an average age of thirty-three
years (range, 14 to 77 years). Intervention: Except for the selection
of the fixation device, open fracture care was similar in the two tre
atment groups. All patients underwent emergent irrigation and debridem
ent with concomitant skeletal stabilization. Cephalosporin antibiotics
were administered perioperatively for twenty-four to forty-eight hour
s. No wounds were closed primarily. Delayed primary closure, skin graf
ting, and/or myoplasty were performed between three and ten days after
injury. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were final f
racture alignment, presence of infection or inflammation, hardware fai
lure, time to union, and the number of operative procedures. Results:
The IMN group had significantly fewer incidences of malalignment than
did the EF group [8 vs. 31 percent; p = 0.00005; confidence interval (
CI) = 0.18, 0.76] and had significantly fewer subsequent procedures (m
ean of 1.7 vs. mean of 2.7 per fracture; p = 0.001; CI = 0.45, 1.59).
IMN resulted in fewer infections/inflammatory problems than did EF at
the injury site (13 vs. 21 percent; p = 0.73; CI = -0.63, 0.45) and si
gnificantly fewer at surgical interfaces (i.e., pin sites, nail and in
terlocking screw insertion sites; 2 vs. 50 percent;p = 0.000; CI = 0.3
9, 0.60). No significant difference was found in the healing rates for
the two implant groups. The more severe Gustilo injury types had long
er healing times regardless of the type of fixation. Conclusions: Resu
lts suggest that unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails are more e
fficacious than half-pin external fixators, in particular with regard
to maintenance of limb alignment. However, the severity of soft tissue
injury rather than the choice of implant appears to be the predominan
t factor influencing rapidity of bone healing and rate of injury site
infection.