Lp. Gambiez et al., RETROPERITONEAL APPROACH AND ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF PERIPANCREATIC NECROSIS COLLECTIONS, Archives of surgery, 133(1), 1998, pp. 66-72
Objective: To review the results of the different modalities of treatm
ent of acute necrotizing pancreatitis that have been used by a single
team during a 6-year period to assess the technique and indications of
an endoscopic method of retroperitoneal drainage that is routinely pe
rformed for the management of peripancreatic necrosis. Design and Sett
ing: Retrospective study of 53 patients in a tertiary care center. Res
ults: All patients had signs of peripancreatic necrosis on initial com
puted tomography scan, 20 patients experienced organ failure during th
e first 7 days of the disease, and bacterial contamination was proved
in 22 (56%) of 39 samples of peripancreatic necrosis. Methods of treat
ment included supportive therapy alone (group 1), percutaneous drainag
e (group 2), endoscopic retroperitoneal drainage (group 3), and laparo
tomy and transperitoneal drainage (group 4). Mortality and mean hospit
al stay were as follows: group 1, 0% and 23 days; group 2, 20% and 89
days; group 3, 10% and 62 days; and group 4, 33% and 86 days. Percutan
eous drainage was beneficial in only 3 cases of sterile collection. Tw
o local complications were related to the method of endoscopic drainag
e. Primary laparotomy was not routinely performed except in patients w
ith an intraperitoneal complication. Overall mortality was 13.2%; mort
ality was significantly higher in patients with an infected necrosis (
32%). Conclusions: The use of endoscopic retroperitoneal drainage seem
ed to be a significant factor in the observed improvement by providing
a reliable drainage of the peripancreatic areas and avoiding the open
ing of the peritoneal cavity. This surgical approach is not exclusive
and may be combined with a secondary laparotomy when needed. The prefe
rred indications of this method are heterogeneous collections of necro
sis with bacterial contamination.