A. Maetzel et al., THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF MISOPROSTOL IN PREVENTING SERIOUS GASTROINTESTINAL EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS, Arthritis and rheumatism, 41(1), 1998, pp. 16-25
Objective. To reexamine the cost-effectiveness of misoprostol, using d
ata from a recently published placebo-controlled trial of misoprostol
in >8,000 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) taking nonsteroidal
antiinflammatory drugs (the Misoprostol Ulcer Complications Outcome Sa
fety Assessment [MUCOSA] study).Methods. Actual clinical events and th
e rates of endoscopies and upper gastrointestinal (GI) radiographic se
ries, hospitalizations, and surgery for these events were derived from
the MUCOSA study and used in a decision analysis. Estimates of costs
for the management of these events were derived from the Ontario Case
Cost Project database and published economic evaluations; cases were a
djusted to 1994 Canadian dollars. Incremental cost-effectiveness (from
the viewpoint of the provincial health care plan in Canada) was calcu
lated for the original trial population (risk of a serious GI complica
tion 1%) and for the subsets of patients with medium (3%) and high (6%
) risk. Results. For the original study population, averting 1 serious
GI complication by prescribing misoprostol would cost an additional $
94,766 (Canadian; range $60,266-137,146). For patients with previous p
eptic ulcer disease (medium risk), the cost would be $14,943 (range $1
0,912-32,157), and for patients with previous peptic ulcer disease and
age >75 (high risk), the cost would be $4,101 (range $-220 to $18,146
). Conclusion. Prescribing misoprostol for all patients with RA who ar
e greater than or equal to 52 years old costs $94,766 for each additio
nal GI event averted. However, when patients at higher risk are specif
ically selected, the cost per averted GI complication is markedly redu
ced. These results, based on actual serious event rates and actual dat
a on endoscopies and upper GI series, hospitalizations, and surgeries,
provide a better estimate of the true cost-effectiveness of misoprost
ol than previous analyses based on endoscopic data and modeling of all
resource utilizations.