A. Wolk et al., A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF ASSOCIATION OF MONOUNSATURATED FAT AND OTHER TYPES OF FAT WITH RISK OF BREAST-CANCER, Archives of internal medicine, 158(1), 1998, pp. 41-45
Background: Animal studies suggest that monounsaturated and polyunsatu
rated fat may have opposite effects on the risk of breast cancer. Meth
ods: We performed a population-based prospective cohort study, includi
ng 61471 women aged 40 to 76 years from 2 counties in central Sweden w
ho did not have any previous diagnosis of cancer; 674 cases of invasiv
e breast cancer occurred during an average follow-up of 4.2 years. All
subjects answered a validated 67-item food frequency questionnaire at
baseline. Cox proportional hat ards models were used to obtain adjust
ed rate ratio (RR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Resu
lts: After mutual adjustment of different types of far, an inverse ass
ociation with monounsaturated fat and a positive association with poly
unsaturated fat were found. The RR for each 10-g increment in daily in
take of monounsaturated fat was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.22-0.95), whereas the
RR for a S-g increment of polyunsaturated fat was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.02-2
.78); the increments correspond to approximately 2 SDs of intake in th
e population. Comparing the highest quartile of intake with the lowest
, we found an RR of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-1.2) for monounsaturated fat and
1.2 (95% CI. 0.9-1.6) for polyunsaturated fat. Saturated fat was not a
ssociated with the risk of breast cancer. Conclusions: Our results ind
icate that various types of fat may have: specific opposite effects on
the risk of breast cancer that closely resemble the corresponding eff
ects in experimental animals. Research investigations and health polic
y considerations should take into account the emerging evidence that m
onounsaturated fat might be protective for risk of breast cancer.