E. Gregory et al., EPIDEMIOLOGIC-STUDY OF CAMPYLOBACTER SPP. IN BROILERS - SOURCE, TIME OF COLONIZATION, AND PREVALENCE, Avian diseases, 41(4), 1997, pp. 890-898
From October 1993 to August 1994, broiler chickens in four grow-out ho
uses, two previously used (houses 1 and 2) and two newly constructed (
houses 3 and 4), were used in a study to determine the source, time of
infection, and prevalence of Campylobacter spp. Cecal droppings and c
ecal samples were obtained from the broilers. Samples were also obtain
ed from water, feed, litter, soil, fans, and workers' boots. Samples w
ere obtained from domestic animals and wildlife species (rectal swabs)
, including insects, on or near the premises. Broilers in houses 2, 3,
and 4 became infected in the second or third week and were fully colo
nized by day 42. Campylobacter appeared in house 1 during week 2 in a
low percentage of the birds, disappearing by the fourth week. Isolates
were also recovered from domestic pigs and water on this farm. In hou
se 3, the organism was isolated from workers' boots and a wild bird pr
ior to isolation from the broilers. Following isolation from ceca drop
pings, the organism was isolated from water, feed, litter, feathers, f
lies, cattle, feces, and wild animals. In house 2, Campylobacter was i
solated from cattle feces and wild birds prior to week 5, when the bro
ilers first became infected, and thereafter from water, feed, insect,
and wildlife, and cecal droppings. It was subsequently isolated from w
orkers' boots, cattle feces, feathers, insects, and other wildlife. Al
l ceca taken from 20 birds each from houses 2 and 3 were positive at t
ime of slaughter (day 49). All ceca from house 1 were negative. No cec
a were collected from birds originating in house 4. No specific source
could be identified from the samples obtained, although apparently th
e organism permeates the environment and several potential sources are
discussed in this paper.