P300 latency is commonly thought to provide a chronometric index of th
e duration of perceptual processing. Because the evidence in favor of
this assumption is controversial, we examined whether P300 latency is
influenced by perceptual processes, response selection, and by motoric
processes in two experiments using a two-choice spatial stimulus-resp
onse compatibility (SRC) task. Both experiments revealed additive effe
cts of perceptual difficulty with spatial SRC in reaction time and P30
0 latency. In addition, Experiment 2 showed that P300 latency measured
in average waveforms is insensitive to motoric processes. The influen
ce of spatial SRC on P300 latency disagrees with the view that P300 la
tency is sensitive only to stimulus evaluation processes. However, P30
0 latency may be used to discriminate between influences on premotoric
and motoric processing stages. A response conflict account for the SR
C effect on P300 latency is suggested.