Ml. Abbott et al., DIFFERENCES IN THE ACCOMMODATION STIMULUS-RESPONSE CURVES OF ADULT MYOPES AND EMMETROPES, Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 18(1), 1998, pp. 13-20
While the accommodation system has been implicated in myopia developme
nt, the nature of this relationship remains obscure. This study invest
igated the differences in accommodation stimulus response curves betwe
en adult myopes and emmetropes. Myopic subjects were classified accord
ing to age of onset and stability of their myopia, Accommodation stimu
lus response curves were measured using three different methods: (i) r
eal targets presented at viewing distances of 4 m to 0.25 m, (ii) a ta
rget at 4 m viewed through negative lenses of increasing power, and (i
ii) a target at 0.25 m viewed through positive lenses of decreasing po
wer, A Canon Autoref R-l measured the accommodation responses at 5 lev
els of demand (increasing from 0 D to 4 D in 1 D steps), We found sign
ificant differences between the three methods used to stimulate an acc
ommodation response in all subject groups, for example, accommodation
lags at high accommodative demands were greatest for the negative lens
series and least for the positive lens series. In addition, while dif
ferences between early-onset myopes, late-onset myopes and emmetropes
were not observed, we did observe differences when myopic subjects wer
e reclassified according to whether their myopia was progressing or st
able, A reduced accommodation response to negative lens-induced accomm
odative demand was found in progressing myopes but not in stable myope
s. These results provide further evidence for the link between myopia
progression and inaccurate accommodation. The data also suggest that a
dult myopes with stable refractive errors show accommodation responses
similar to that of emmetropes. (C) 1998 The College of Optometrists.
Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.