Sixty-two witnesses observed a target person and two days later either
verbally described or constructed a facial composite of the target us
ing the Mac-A-Mug Pro facial composite system. The composite productio
n was preceded by either a guided memory or a standard police intervie
w. The resulting composites were of low quality (not at all similar to
a photograph of the target) and were of no value in selecting the tar
get from a group of similar-looking people. It was suggested that the
Mac-A-Mug Pro system is not useful for realistic witness settings, in
which witnesses must construct the composites from memory. Suggestions
are provided for modifying facial composite systems to make them more
compatible with the psychological processes mediating face recall.