We discuss contrasting approaches to cladistic character definition an
d thus to cladistic data matrix compilation The conventional approach
considers character states as alternate forms of the ''same thing'' (t
he character). A review of the challenges to this convention is presen
ted, and their implications evaluated. We argue that the recognition o
f structures which are alternate forms is a vital stage of primary hom
ology assessment and is equivalent to the conceptualization of a trans
formational homology. Such a view complies with the demand that charac
ters are independent and that character states are hierarchically rela
ted. We identify one justifiable solution to the inapplicable data cod
ing problem (coding for organisms which have red tails, blue tails or
no tails), and show that alternative approaches to character definitio
n support spurious solutions which deny the relation of structures whi
ch are ''the same but different''. We propose that the term character
can be defined, in a cladistic context, as the descriptive label refer
ring to a transformational homology evidenced by the similarity criter
ion. (C) 1997 The Willi Hennig Society.