`Homeopathic remedies are advocated for the treatment of postoperative
ileus, yet data from clinical trials are inconclusive. We therefore p
erformed meta-analyses of existing clinical trials to determine whethe
r homeopathic treatment has any greater effect than placebo administra
tion on the restoration of intestinal peristalsis in patients after ab
dominal or gynecologic surgery. We conducted systematic literature sea
rches to identify relevant clinical trials. Meta-analyses were conduct
ed using RevMan software. Separate meta-analyses sere conducted for an
y homeopathic treatment versus placebo; homeopathic remedies of <12C p
otency versus placebo, homeopathic remedies of greater than or equal t
o 12C potency versus placebo. A ''sensitivity analysis'' was performed
to test the effect of excluding studies of low methodologic quality.
Our endpoint was time to first flatus. Meta-analyses indicated a stati
stically significant (p < 0.05) weighted mean difference (WMD) in favo
r of homeopathy (compared with placebo) on the time to first flatus. M
eta-analyses of the three studies that compared homeopathic remedies g
reater than or equal to 12C versus placebo showed no significant diffe
rence (p > 0.05). Meta-analyses of studies comparing homeopathic remed
ies <12C with placebo indicated a statistically significant (p < 0.05)
WMD in favor of homeopathy on the time to first flatus. Excluding met
hodologically weak trials did not substantially change any of the resu
lts. There is evidence that homeopathic treatment can reduce the durat
ion of ileus after abdominal or gynecologic surgery. However, several
caveats preclude a definitive judgment. These results should form the
basis of a randomized controlled trial to resolve the issue.