WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL DOSE OF BOTULINUM TOXIN-A IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL DYSTONIA - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOSE-RANGING STUDY USING DYSPORT(R)

Citation
W. Poewe et al., WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL DOSE OF BOTULINUM TOXIN-A IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL DYSTONIA - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOSE-RANGING STUDY USING DYSPORT(R), Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 64(1), 1998, pp. 13-17
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Neurology",Surgery
ISSN journal
00223050
Volume
64
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
13 - 17
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3050(1998)64:1<13:WITODO>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Objectives-Botulinum toxin have become a first line approach in cervic al dystonia. Nevertheless, published dosing schedules, responder rates , and frequency of adverse events vary widely. The present prospective multicentre placebo controlled double blind dose ranging study was pe rformed in a homogenous group of previously untreated patients with ro tational torticollis to obtain objective data on dose-response relatio ns. Methods-Seventy five patients were randomly assigned to receive tr eatment with placebo or total doses of 250, 500, and 1000 Dysport(R) u nits divided between one splenius capitis (0, 175, 350, 700 units) and the contralateral sternocleidomastoid (0, 75, 150, 300 units) muscle. Assessments were obtained at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 8 after tre atment and comprised a modified Tsui scale, a four point pain scale, a checklist of adverse events, global assessment of improvement, and a global rating taking into account efficacy and adverse events. At week 8 the need for retreatment was assessed and then the code was unblind ed. For those still responding, there was an open follow up until retr eatment to assess the duration of effect. Results-seventy nine per cen t reported subjective improvement at one or more follow up visits. Dec reases in the modified Tsui score were significant at week 4 for the 5 00 and 1000 unit groups versus placebo (p<0.05). Additionally positive dose-response relations were found for the degree of subjective impro vement, duration of improvement, improvement on clinical global rating , and need for reinjection at eight weeks. A significant dose relation was also established for the number of adverse events overall and for the incidence of neck muscle weakness and voice changes. Conclusion-M agnitude and duration of improvement was greatest after injections of 1000 units Dysport(R); however, at the cost of significantly more adve rse events. Therefore a lower starting dose of 500 units Dysport(R) is recommended in patients with cervical dystonia, with upward titration at subsequent injection sessions if clinically necessary.