BISPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF THE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM PREDICTS CONSCIOUS PROCESSING OF INFORMATION DURING PROPOFOL SEDATION AND HYPNOSIS

Citation
La. Kearse et al., BISPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF THE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM PREDICTS CONSCIOUS PROCESSING OF INFORMATION DURING PROPOFOL SEDATION AND HYPNOSIS, Anesthesiology, 88(1), 1998, pp. 25-34
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00033022
Volume
88
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
25 - 34
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(1998)88:1<25:BAOTEP>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background: The bispectral index (BLS) measures changes in the interfr equency coupling of the electroencephalogram (EEG). The purposes of th is study mere (1) to determine whether BIS correlates with responses t o command during sedation and hypnosis induced by propofol or propofol and nitrous oxide, and (2) to compare BIS to targeted and measured co ncentrations of propofol in predicting participants' responses to comm ands. Methods: Twenty volunteers (15 men and 5 women, aged 22-50 yr) w ere given propofol by computer-controlled infusion, and EEG was record ed for off-line analysis of BIS. Responses to randomly ordered verbal commands or voice plus touch were measured with two categorical scales (CS1 and CS2, respectively). All subjects received a propofol infusio n targeted to achieve effect site concentrations of 1, 2, 4, 2, 1, and 0 mu g/ml. Ten participants had repeated infusion, whereas 10 others breathed 30% nitrous oxide and oxygen and received a propofol infusion targeted for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0 mu g/ml. Five minutes aft er each targeted concentration had been reached, CS1, CS2, and arteria l propofol concentration were determined. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare the accuracy of (1) BIS, (2) targeted propofol concentration, (3) measured concentration, and (4) treatment history as predictors of response. Results: Bispect ral index was a strong predictor of CS1 and CS2 (P < 0.0001) and signi ficantly more accurate than targeted or measured propofol concentratio ns (P < 0.0003 and P < 0.003, respectively), It also provided addition al predictive power when combined with treatment history (P < 0.02). N itrous oxide slightly decreased the probability of response at a given value of BIS (P < 0.05), but accuracy was unaffected. Conclusions: Bi spectral index accurately predicts response to verbal commands during sedation and hypnosis with propofol or propofol plus nitrous oxide. Ac curacy is maintained in situations likely to be encountered during cli nical use: when propofol concentrations are increasing or decreasing a nd when repeated measurements are made over time.