Objective: To compare the performance of cochlear implant patients and
normal-hearing subjects on a musical interval labeling task, and to d
etermine whether information regarding musical interval size is availa
ble to cochlear implant patients under realistic everyday listening co
nditions. Design: Two Nucleus cochlear implant patients listened to mu
sical intervals that consisted of systematic variations of electric pu
lse rate on single bipolar intracochlear electrode pairs whereas norma
l-hearing listeners were presented with the acoustical analog of these
stimuli. Subjects labeled the intonation quality of the stimulus inte
rvals (''flat,'' ''sharp,'' or ''in tune''), relative to their memory
for specific intervals abstracted from familiar melodies. The cochlear
implant patients, in addition, performed this task with realistic aco
ustical musical stimuli. Results: The interval labeling behavior of co
chlear implant subjects, at low pulse rates, was similar to that of no
rmal-hearing subjects. Furthermore, pitch interval information does no
t appear to be available to cochlear implant subjects when they are li
stening to acoustical stimuli via their speech processors. Conclusions
: Temporal information appears to be sufficient for the perception of
musical pitch. Encoding strategies that are highly successful isl rest
oring speech understanding do not necessarily provide information rega
rding melodic pitch interval size.