West Texas is the setting for an unintended experiment in commons reso
urce management. Dispersed, autonomous, local groundwater districts us
e nonregulatory strategies to promote conservation and groundwater qua
lity. The central force driving this organizational form appears to be
ideological. West Texans seek alternatives to slate management of gro
undwater pumping. This study uses Key-informant interviews to evaluate
the strength of ideology in explaining West Texas groundwater policy
and to provide a theoretical framework for discussing the importance o
f the ''local solution.'' Time-series data substantiate the claim that
local groundwater districts succeed in slowing depletion rates.