Ga. Ateshian et al., FINITE DEFORMATION BIPHASIC MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF BOVINE ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE FROM CONFINED COMPRESSION EXPERIMENTS, Journal of biomechanics, 30(11-12), 1997, pp. 1157-1164
In 1990, Holmes and Mow [Journal of Biomechanics 23, 1145-1156] develo
ped a hyperelastic biphasic theory to describe finite deformation beha
viors of articular cartilage. To date, however, no experimental finite
deformation studies have been made to assess the ability of this cons
titutive model to describe its finite deformation behaviors (e.g. kine
tic creep and stress-relaxation, and equilibrium responses). The objec
tives of this study are: (1) to investigate whether this hyperelastic
biphasic theory can be used to curve-fit the finite deformation compre
ssive stress-relaxation behavior of the tissue, and from this procedur
e, to calculate its material coefficients; and (2) to investigate whet
her the theory, together with the calculated material coefficients, ca
n accurately predict the outcome of an independent creep experiment fo
llowed by cyclical loading of the tissue. To achieve these objectives,
circular cylindrical cartilage plugs were tested in confined compress
ion in both stress-relaxation and creep experiments. Results demonstra
ted that curve-fits of the stress-relaxation experiments produced nonl
inear generalized correlation coefficients of r(2) = 0.99 +/- 0.02 (me
an +/- standard deviation); theoretical predictions of the creep test
differed on average by 10.0% +/- 2.0% relative to experimental results
. When curve-fitting the creep experiments as well, it was found that
the permeability coefficients differed from those obtained from the st
ress-relaxation experiments (k(0,cr) = 2.2 +/- 0.8 x 10(-15) m(4) N-1
s(-1) and M-cr = 0.4 +/- 0.8 vs k(0,sr) = 2.7 +/- 1.5 x 10(-15) m(4) N
-1 s(-1) and M-sr = 2.2 +/- 1.0); these differences may be attributed
to imprecisions in the curve fitting procedure stemming from the low s
ensitivity of the stress-relaxation and creep behaviors to large varia
tions of M in the permeability function. Advantages and limitations of
this theoretical model are presented in the text. (C) 1997 Published
by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.