R. Bailey et al., IMPACT OF CLINICAL PATHWAYS AND PRACTICE GUIDELINES ON THE MANAGEMENTOF ACUTE EXACERBATIONS OF BRONCHIAL-ASTHMA, Chest, 113(1), 1998, pp. 28-33
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Objectives: In 1990, it was estimated that approximately 1% of all US
health-care costs (approximately $6.2 billion) were spent on asthma-re
lated health expenses. Of this, hospitalization charges alone exceeded
$2.6 billion. Practice guidelines and clinical pathways are being dev
eloped to standardize the management of acute asthma with the aim of i
mproving care and safely reducing health-care costs. In this report, w
e evaluate the impact of an asthma pathway developed and instituted at
a large community-based teaching hospital. This pathway was evidence
based and was developed by a multidisciplinary) group. Methods: The st
udy was conducted during a 6-month period in 1995, while a similar per
iod in 1994 was used as a historical control period. Data collected in
cluded patient demographics, hospital admission and discharge peak exp
iratory flow rates, pulse oximetry measurements, length of stay, conve
rsion from hand-held nebulizer to metered-close inhaler, use of cortic
osteroids within 24 h of hospitalization, and conversion of IV steroid
s to oral steroids. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled duri
ng the study period. Of these, 19 mere placed on the pathway, while 23
were not treated according to the pathway. There were 38 patients in
the 1994 historical control period. For 1995, there was no significant
difference between the pathway and nonpathway groups with regard to t
he length of stay (4.4+/-3.3 vs 3.2+/-2.3 days; p>0.05), hospital disc
harge peak expiratory now rates (324 vs 286 L/min; p>0.05), or use of
steroids (100% vs 91%; p>0.05). However, a significant increase in con
version from hand-held nebulizer to metered-dose inhaler was noted in
the pathway group (68% vs 34%; p<0.05). The data from 1994 compared to
1995 pathway were similar in that there was no difference in the leng
th of stay (3.4+/-2.1 vs 4.4+/-3.3 days; p>0.05) and/or use of steroid
s (92% vs 100%; p>0.05), while a significant increase in hand-held neb
ulizer to metered-dose inhaler conversion was observed for the 1995 pa
thway group (68% vs 26%; p=0.002). Conclusions: We conclude that altho
ugh the asthma pathway did not significantly reduce length of stay, it
was associated with a significant increase in hand-held nebulizer tb
metered-dose inhaler conversion, resulting in a substantial cost savin
gs of $288,000/year.