N. Yerushalmi et R. Margalit, HYALURONIC ACID-MODIFIED BIOADHESIVE LIPOSOMES AS LOCAL-DRUG DEPOTS -EFFECTS OF CELLULAR AND FLUID-DYNAMICS ON LIPOSOME RETENTION AT TARGET SITES, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 349(1), 1998, pp. 21-26
Bioadhesive liposomes, in which hyaluronic acid is the surface-anchore
d bioadhesive ligand, are being tested in vitro in order to evaluate t
heir bioadhesivity. The first part of the test, binding to monolayers
of cells modeling the in vivo designated sites under static conditions
, was reported in a previous communication. This communication reports
the results of the second and third parts of the test, which consist
of evaluating the retention of bound liposomes in the face of tissue-r
elated events such as cell migration, proliferation, and death, and un
der fluid flow. The in vivo-designated binding sites for the bioadhesi
ve liposomes were modeled, as before, by monolayers of the A431 cell.
line served. A setup for perfusing a culture flask containing a monola
yer of cells was devised for measuring the retention under fluid flow.
The major findings are: (1) Over a selected tested period of 28 h, th
e cell cultures mimicked the tissue-related events described above, wh
ether they did or did not receive a dose of liposomes. Over the same p
eriod and throughout these events, the bioadhesive liposomes remained
bound at equilibrium-like levels, in the range of 0.03 ng lipid/10(5)
cells. (2) Fluid flowed over a cell monolayer dosed with bioadhesive l
iposomes swept away part of the dose. This loss was due mostly to that
fraction of the dose which was in excess of the binding capacity of t
he monolayer, and occurred over the first 15 min of flow. Thereafter,
the cell monolayer retained the bound liposomes, at equilibrium-like l
evels and with no further loss, even for the longest dow period tested
(45 min of continuous flow) and under a flow rate of 0.64 ml/min. Thi
s study, together with previous results, shows that the hyaluronic aci
d-modified liposomes meet all parts of the bioadhesivity test. We ther
efore find merit in their further investigation. (C) 1998 Academic Pre
ss.