TAZOBACTAM-PIPERACILLIN COMPARED WITH SULBACTAM-AMPICILLIN, CLAVULANIC ACID-TICARCILLIN, SULBACTAM-CEFOPERAZONE, AND PIPERACILLIN FOR ACTIVITY AGAINST BETA-LACTAMASE-PRODUCING BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM PATIENTS WITH COMPLICATED URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS
S. Nomura et al., TAZOBACTAM-PIPERACILLIN COMPARED WITH SULBACTAM-AMPICILLIN, CLAVULANIC ACID-TICARCILLIN, SULBACTAM-CEFOPERAZONE, AND PIPERACILLIN FOR ACTIVITY AGAINST BETA-LACTAMASE-PRODUCING BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM PATIENTS WITH COMPLICATED URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS, Journal of chemotherapy, 9(2), 1997, pp. 89-94
The antibacterial activity of tazobactam-piperacillin was compared wit
h that of sulbactam-ampicillin, clavulanic acid-ticarcillin, sulbactam
-cefoperazone and piperacillin against beta-lactamase-producing bacter
ia isolated from patients with complicated urinary tract infections. T
azobactam-piperacillin showed a broad antibacterial spectrum against
gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. The minimum inhibitory conce
ntrations (MIC90) of tazobactam-piperacillin were 6.25 mu g/ml against
Escherichia coli, 1.56 mu g/ml against Proteus mirabilis, 3.13 mu g/m
l against Proteus vulgaris, 6.25 mu g/ml against methicillin-susceptib
le Staphylococcus aureus and 6.25 mu g/ml coagulase-negative methicill
in-susceptible staphylococci. Against all beta-lactamase-producing bac
teria tested the antibacterial activity of tazobactam-piperacillin was
at least 4- to 64-fold stronger than that of piperacillin, clavulanic
acid-ticarcillin, and sulbactamampicillin, and similar to or greater
than that of sulbactam-cefoperazone except for E. coli.