A. Polyzos et al., CHEMOTHERAPY OF NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A PROSPECTIVELY RANDOMIZED STUDY OF CISPLATIN-ETOPOSIDE VERSUS CISPLATIN-MITOMYCIN-VINBLASTINE, Journal of chemotherapy, 9(2), 1997, pp. 102-105
Based on preclinical studies showing synergism between cisplatin and e
toposide, we randomized patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCL
C) to receive either the above combination (cisplatin 100mg/m(2) day 1
, etoposide 130mg/m(2) days 1-3) or the combination of cisplatin-mitom
ycin-e and vinca drugs (MVP) (cisplatin 100mg/m(2), vinblastine 6mg/m(
2), mitomycin 10mg/m(2) day 1), a regimen with a steady response rate.
Partial responses were achieved in 12/44 (27%) of the cisplatin-etopo
side group and in 11/43 (26%) of the MVR group. No difference in media
n survival could be demonstrated between the two groups (36 weeks vers
us 38 weeks). Myelotoxicity and alopecia were more severe in the cispl
atin-etoposide group. Compared to international experience both regime
ns exhibited a relatively low response rate. It seems that for NSCLC n
ew agents are required.