Over a 2-month period the seabed drag coefficient C-100 at a site in t
he eastern Irish Sea (26-m water depth) had a mean value of 0.0025, wh
ich is the value typically assumed, but was highly variable. The objec
tive of the analysis was to unravel the causes of the variability in C
-100. An error analysis revealed that a considerable part of the varia
bility could be due simply to random errors in the estimates of fricti
on velocity, from which C-100 was deduced, but the error bounds did no
t enclose all of the data. Wave-current interaction was ruled out as t
he principal cause of the variability because waves were small and the
re was no noticeable correlation between C-100 and ratio of wave-orbit
al speed to tidal-current speed. Classifying the boundary-layer flow i
nto smooth-turbulent, transitional, and rough-turbulent regimes implie
d that flow-regime transitions could explain much of the variability,
however, inspection of the data revealed a contradiction that made tha
t explanation unlikely: the classification implied that the boundary-l
ayer flow was rough turbulent during neap tides but was smooth turbule
nt under peak spring-tide currents. The classification scheme was base
d on the assumption of neutral stability, which, according to the stab
ility parameter z/L, was violated for a considerable portion of the ti
me. Boundary-layer stratification by suspended sediment was found to p
rovide a coherent explanation for drag coefficient variability; when z
/L < 0.03, C-100 was relatively constant, which reflected a relatively
constant underlying bed roughness, but when z/L > 0.03, the buoyancy
flux due to the suspended sediment caused C-100 to vary widely. The an
alysis of the stratified-flow dynamics includes the development of an
equation (correct to second order in z/L, where z/L is small) for esti
mating bed shear stress from the velocity spectrum, which extends the
applicability of the well-known ''inertial-dissipation'' method into t
he region z/L > 0.03.