Sj. Katz et al., PHYSICIAN RELATIONS IN CANADA - SHOOTING INWARD AS THE CIRCLE CLOSES, Journal of health politics, policy and law, 22(6), 1997, pp. 1413-1431
As economic disputes between physicians become more frequent, discussi
ons between physicians are becoming increasingly important. Those seek
ing insight into how physician organizations might mediate these dispu
tes may be able to learn from others who have had negotiating responsi
bilities for over a quarter of a century-the provincial medical associ
ations in Canada. in this article we examine the structure, process, a
nd outcomes of negotiations between physicians, with a focus on respon
ses to new physician expenditure caps in Ontario, Alberta, and British
Columbia. Early negotiations between physicians over changes in relat
ive fees favored general practitioners because they were the dominant
voting block within the associations. Despite fewer gains in the fee a
rena, specialists were willing to remain in the associations because a
ll physicians generally enjoyed similar income growth. Under new physi
cian expenditure caps, however, physicians have been unable to resolve
conflicts over how to allocate income limits across specialties. Nego
tiations between physicians face expanding economic issues and di verg
ing interests as expenditure caps force physicians to concentrate on t
otal costs.