Rk. Zimmerman et al., PHYSICIAN CONCERNS ABOUT VACCINE ADVERSE-EFFECTS AND POTENTIAL LITIGATION, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 152(1), 1998, pp. 12-19
Objective: To understand physician concerns about litigation and belie
fs regarding vaccine safety. Design: A stratified random sample of fam
ily physicians, pediatricians, and general practitioners younger than
65 years who were in office-based practices across the United States w
as selected from the American Medical Association list that includes n
onmembers. A standardized telephone survey was conducted by trained in
terviewers in 1995. Participants: Physicians seeing 5 or more patients
per week younger than 6 years and having 50% or more primary care pat
ients were eligible for the study. Results: Of the 1236 physicians who
were surveyed, 32% and 13% overestimated the risk for serious adverse
effects related to pertussis and measles vaccines, respectively. Amon
g physicians who thought that serious adverse effects from diphtheria
and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTP) were unlikely, 15% wer
e highly concerned about litigation; however, among those with higher
ratings of the likelihood of serious adverse effects, 38% were highly
concerned about vaccine litigation (P<.01). Of those aware of the Vacc
ine Injury Compensation Program, only 41% believed that it afforded a
high level of liability protection; 22% believed that it gives little
protection, and 37% gave an intermediate answer. Among physicians high
ly concerned about vaccine litigation, 22% were unlikely to recommend
the third dose of DTP for a child with a fever of 39.4 degrees C and n
o other symptoms after the second dose of DTP, whereas among those exp
ressing little concern about litigation, only 12% were unlikely to vac
cinate (P<.05). Although some physicians were concerned about litigati
on, most (86%) encouraged vaccination even if a parent was argumentati
ve about possible adverse effects. Conclusion: Physicians' perceptions
about the risk for adverse effects and protection afforded by the Vac
cine Injury Compensation Program influence their concern about litigat
ion and, to a lesser extent, their reported likelihood to administer i
mmunizations.