Identifying the interests of client groups is obviously vital for good
planning. Yet, the accurate identification of people's interests, esp
ecially in relation to ''quality-of-life'' issues, involves complex ju
dgments; mistaken judgements of interest are therefore always likely.
This paper explores this problem by clarifying the different kinds of
mistaken interest judgements we can make and discussing how such mista
kes may be minimized in relation to planning. The suggestions presente
d for minimizing mistaken interest judgements-suggestions about ration
al deliberation and the collective discussion of interests-further sup
port what I term the ''discourse model'' of planning, which has emerge
d in planning theory in recent years. The paper also draws some implic
ations for the methodology of empirical research into people's interes
ts, and concludes by connecting the discussion with the idea of delibe
rative democracy.