We have used quantitative DNase I footprinting to examine the ability
of distamycin and Hoechst 33258 to discriminate between different arra
ngements of AT residues, using synthetic DNA fragments containing mult
iple blocks of (A/T)(6) or (A/T)(10) in identical sequence environment
s, Previous studies have shown that these ligands bind less well to (A
/T)(4) sites containing TpA steps, We find that in (A/T)(6) tracts dis
tamycin shows little discrimination between the various sites, binding
similar to 2-fold stronger to TAATTA than (TA)(3), T(3)A(3) and GAATT
C. In contrast, Hoechst 33258 binds similar to 20-fold more tightly to
GAATTC and TAATTA than T(3)A(3) and (TA)(3). Hydroxyl radical footpri
nting reveals that both ligands bind in similar locations at the centr
e of each AT tract, At (A/T)10 sites distamycin binds with similar aff
inity to T(5)A(5), (TA)(5) and AATT, though bands in the centre of (TA
)(5) are protected at similar to 50-fold lower concentration than thos
e towards the edges, Hoechst 33258 shows a similar pattern of preferen
ce, with strong binding to AATT, T(5)A(5) and the centre of (TA)(5). H
ydroxyl radical footprinting reveals that at low concentrations both l
igands bind at the centre of (TA)(5) and A(5)T(5), while at higher con
centrations ligand molecules bind to each end of the (A/T)(10) tracts,
At T(5)A(5) two ligand molecules bind at either end of the site, even
at the lowest ligand concentration, consistent with the suggestion th
at these compounds avoid the TpA step, Similar DNase I footprinting ex
periments with a DNA fragment containing T-n (n = 3-6) tracts reveals
that both ligands bind in the order T-3 < T-4 much less than T-5 = T-6
.