Pl. Storring et al., EPOETIN-ALFA AND EPOETIN-BETA DIFFER IN THEIR ERYTHROPOIETIN ISOFORM COMPOSITIONS AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, British Journal of Haematology, 100(1), 1998, pp. 79-89
Epoetin alfa and beta are the two forms of recombinant DNA-derived ery
thropoietin (rEPO), both synthesized in Chinese hamster ovary cells, w
hich are used for the treatment of erythropoietin (EPO)-responsive ana
emias. Several batches of each of these rEPOs were compared for differ
ences in their EPO isoform compositions by isoelectric focusing (IEF)
and in a range of lectin-binding assays, and for differences in their
EPO activities by in-vivo and in-vitro mouse bioassays and by immunoas
say. Epoetin beta was found to differ from epoetin alfa in containing:
(a) a greater proportion of more basic isoforms, (b) a greater propor
tion of EPO binding to Erythrina cristagalli agglutinin (which binds N
-glycans with non-sialylated outer Gal beta 1-4GlcNAc moieties), and (
c) isoforms with higher in-vivo:in-vitro bioactivity ratios, Epoetin b
eta also contained slightly more than epoetin alfa of EPO binding to L
ycopersicon esculentum agglutinin (which binds N-glycans containing re
peating Gal beta 1-4GlcNAc sequences), to the leucoagglutinin of Phase
olus vulgaris (which binds tetra-antennary and 2,6-branched triantenna
ry N-glycans) and to Agaricus bisporus agglutinin (which binds Gal bet
a 1-3GalNAc containing O-glycans). No differences were found between t
he two rEPOs in their binding to a further five lectins. The differenc
es between the isoform composition of epoetin alfa and beta, and the s
maller inter-batch differences appear to be due to differences in glyc
osylation. The higher murine in-vivo:in-vitro bioactivity ratio of epo
etin beta compared to epoetin alfa could not be explained in terms of
differences in their degrees of sialylation, but was consistent with d
ifferences in their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics observed in
human subjects, There have been no reports that epoetin alfa differs f
rom epoetin beta in its clinical efficacy, but the differences between
epoetin alfa and beta in some analytical systems suggest that there m
ight be a need for separate international standards for these two type
s of rEPO.