Rg. Buchheit et al., A CORRELATION BETWEEN SALT SPRAY AND ELECTROCHEMICAL IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY TEST-RESULTS FOR CONVERSION-COATED ALUMINUM-ALLOYS, Corrosion, 54(1), 1998, pp. 61-72
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Material Science","Metallurgy & Metallurigical Engineering
The corrosion resistance of 33 inorganic conversion coatings applied t
o five aluminum alloys was tested by salt spray exposure and electroch
emical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), Results were evaluated to determi
ne if a relationship existed. Individual salt spray test panels, with
an area of 30 in(2) (194 cm(2)), were inspected visually at regular in
tervals up to 168 h of exposure. At each inspection interval, panels w
ere assigned a pass rank if < 5 pits were observed, or a fail rank if
> 5 pits were observed, EIS data were analyzed using a simple equivale
nt circuit which yielded a coating resistance (R-c), which was used as
a figure of merit to assess coating performance. Examination of the d
ata showed both tests could be sensitive discriminators of corrosion p
rotection, but that EIS was more discriminating in the extremes of coa
ting performance, Analysis showed the probability of achieving a passi
ng salt spray result increased as R-c increased. In the regimes where
both tests were sensitive, regression analysis showed a linear relatio
nship existed for each alloy substrate between the log of R-c and the
probability of a coating meeting the pass/fail criterion in salt spray
. Based upon these relationships, threshold R-c values were proposed t
o define the minimum value for which a given coating can be expected t
o attain a passing result in a 168-h salt spray test. These values wer
e 2 x 10(6) Ohm-cm(2) to 5 x 10(6) Ohm-cm(2) for Al 356 (UNS A13560),
Al 2024-T3 (UNS A92024), and Al 6061-T6 (UNS A96061); 1.5 x 10(7) Ohm-
cm(2) for Al 7075-T6 (UNS A97075): and 2.3 x 10(6) Ohm-cm(2) for Al 30
03 (UNS A93003).