Why do companies frequently make bad investment decisions and Continue
to blunder, even after the weaknesses in their capital: budgeting ana
lyses are evident? Because,;according to the authors; they don't integ
rate capital budgeting into their overall strategy. Boquist et ai:. of
fer a capital budgeting framework that has six key features: (1) it is
dynamic, (2) it is integral to the firm's strategy, (3) it recognizes
sequences of options, (4) it is cross-functional, (5) it aligns emplo
yee compensation with capital allocation, and (6) it emphasizes perfor
mance-based training. wealth. The authors' framework for dynamic capit
al budgeting has three simultaneous steps: 1. Identify a status quo st
rategy and how it must perform to maximize shareholder value, The stra
tegy will help the company determine the trade-off in capital budgetin
g between cycle time and risk. The more time and resources it commits
to collecting information: about a project, the more it can learn abou
t cash flows and the lower the risk. But it achieves this risk reducti
on at the expense of a longer cycle lime. 2. Establish a system for ev
aluating projects and preparing capital allocation requests that is co
nsistent with the strategy. The system has four phases - a new idea ph
ase, preliminary evaluation phase, business evaluation phase, and go-a
head or reject phase - and three tollgates - strategic, preliminary, a
nd business. For approval, a project must pass through all three tollg
ates. 3. Develop a culture consistent with the strategy and the evalua
tion system. The company's long-term commitment to the strategy should
be evident to employees. Employees from ail functional areas should b
e trained in the system's underpinnings.:The employee compensation sys
tem should tie bonuses to performance measures that correlate with sha
reholder Only by implementing an integrated framework, say the authors
, can a company make intelligent investment decisions with long-term s
trategy in mind.