Ie. Messinis et al., EFFECT OF MIFEPRISTONE ON FOLLICULOGENESIS IN WOMEN TREATED WITH RECOMBINANT FSH, Clinical endocrinology, 46(3), 1997, pp. 309-314
OBJECTIVE To study the mechanism through which mifepristone interrupts
folliculogenesis. DESIGN Normally ovulating women undergoing donor in
trauterine insemination (IUI) treatment were investigated during two m
enstrual cycles treated with gonadotrophins. In the first cycle (FSH c
ycle), the women were given 150 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH) s.c. on days
2, 4, 6, 8 and daily thereafter until the administration of hCG. Duri
ng the second cycle (FSH + mifepristone cycle), the women received rFS
H as above plus mifepristone tablets at a dose of 50 mg/day from cycle
day 2 until the hCG injection, IUI was performed only in the FSH cycl
es. PATIENTS Eleven normally ovulating women were studied, The women w
ere used as their own controls during the cycle treated with rFSH only
. RESULTS Two women became pregnant during the FSH cycle and, therefor
e, data for comparison between the two cycles were available in nine w
omen, In both cycles, only one follicle reached the preovulatory stage
, However, during treatment with FSH + mifepristone the growth of the
dominant follicle was temporarily arrested after day 8 of the cycle an
d ovulation was postponed by 2 days on average. Serum FSH values incre
ased significantly in both cycles only during the daily administration
of rFSH, i.e. towards the end of the experimental period when a norma
l growth of the follicle was re-established. On the day of hCG injecti
on, an endogenous LH surge had already started in six of the nine cycl
es treated with FSH (67%) but in none of the FSH + mifepristone cycles
despite the preovulatory oestradiol (E-2) levels. Endometrial thickne
ss during the follicular phase and serum E-2 and progesterone concentr
ations during the luteal phase, although in the normal limits, were si
gnificantly lower in the FSH + mifepristone than in the FSH cycles. CO
NCLUSIONS These results suggest that mifepristone arrests follicular d
evelopment at a stage beyond the recruitment-selection point by delayi
ng the growth of the dominant follicle. This is probably achieved thro
ugh an effect of mifepristone on the ovary where it reduces the sensit
ivity of the selected follicle to FSH. Mifepristone may have a potenti
al application for the inhibition of the LH surge in superovulation in
duction programmes.