Ka. Kacena et al., POOLING URINE SAMPLES FOR LIGASE CHAIN-REACTION SCREENING FOR GENITALCHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS INFECTION IN ASYMPTOMATIC WOMEN, Journal of clinical microbiology, 36(2), 1998, pp. 481-485
The accuracy of pooling urine samples for the detection of genital Chl
amydia trachomatis infection by ligase chain reaction (LCR) was examin
ed, A model was also developed to determine the number of samples to b
e pooled for optimal cost savings at various population prevalences, E
stimated costs included technician time, laboratory consumables, and a
ssay costs of testing pooled samples and retesting individual specimen
s from presumptive positive pools: Estimation of population prevalence
based on the pooled LCR results was also applied, After individual ur
ine specimens were processed, 568 specimens were pooled by 4 into 142
poets and another 520 specimens were pooled by 10 into 52 pools. For c
omparison, all 1,088 urine specimens were tested individually. The sam
ple-to-cut-off ratio was lowered from 1.0 to 0.2 for pooled samples, a
fter a pilot study which tested 148 samples pooled by 4 was conducted.
The pooling algorithm was 100% (48 of 48) sensitive when samples were
pooled by 4 and 98.4% (61 of 62) Sensitive when samples were pooled b
y 10. Although 2.0% (2 of 99) of the negative pools of 4 and 7.1% (1 o
f 14) of the negative pools of 10 tested presumptive positive, all sam
ples in these presumptive-positive pools were negative when retested i
ndividually, making the pooling algorithm 100% specific. In a populati
on with 8% genital C. trachomatis prevalence, pooling by four would re
duce costs by 39%. The model demonstrated that with a lower prevalence
of 2%, pooling eight samples would reduce costs by 59%. Pooling urine
samples for detection of C. trachomatis by LCR is sensitive, specific
, and cost saving compared to testing individual samples.