Mk. Hudspeth et al., EVALUATION OF THE RAPID CB PLUS SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CORYNEBACTERIUM SPECIES AND OTHER GRAM-POSITIVE RODS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 36(2), 1998, pp. 543-547
Due to the difficulty of identifying Corynebacterium spp. with standar
d methods, we compared them with the RapID CB Plus system (Remel, Lene
xa, Kans. [formerly Innovative Diagnostic Systems, Norcross, Ga.]), wh
ich consists of 4 carbohydrate and 14 preformed enzyme tests, for the
identification of 98 clinical isolates of Corynebacterium sp., other c
oryneforms, Listeria monocytogenes, and 17 ATCC strains. Forty (95%) o
f 42 strains of Corynebacterium spp. were accurately identified to the
species level by the RapID CB Plus system, and two additional strains
of C. striatum were identified with one additional conventional test
for lipid requirement. Twenty-seven (75%) of the 36 coryneform strains
tested were identified correctly to the species level. However, three
of four strains of Brevibacterium sp. and all seven of the L. monocyt
ogenes strains were identified to the genus level only. Actinomyces st
rains had variable results, and the one strain of Arcanobacterium haem
olyticum tested was not identified. Overall, the RapID CB Plus system
compared favorably with the conventional methods, was easy to inoculat
e and interpret, and is promising as a new method for identification o
f gram-positive bacilli.