E. Cantu et al., TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL SPEECH - PREDICTORS OF SUCCESS AND SOCIAL VALIDITY RATINGS, American journal of otolaryngology, 19(1), 1998, pp. 12-17
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine long-term success ra
tes and predictors of success for patients who had undergone either pr
imary or secondary tracheoesophageal puncture. An additional aim was t
o compare judgments of communication effectiveness made by a speech-la
nguage pathologist with those made by the patient or significant other
. Patients and Methods: Thirty-six laryngectomees were initially rated
on a 5-point functional communication scale. These ratings resulted i
n the formation of two distinct groups that were identified as ''succe
ssful'' and ''unsuccessful.'' The groups were compared on the basis of
age at time of surgery and 10 categorical variables that have been im
plicated in the success or failure of tracheoesophageal puncture surge
ry. Results: Results indicated that nearly two thirds of the patients
had successful communication at an average of approximately 4 years po
sttracheoesophageal puncture. For the 13 patients judged as ''unsucces
sful,'' reduced vision, limited arm/hand movement, and history of radi
otherapy were found in significantly greater numbers. When communicati
on profile ratings made by a speech-language pathologist were compared
with those made by the patient or significant other (P/SO), approxima
tely one-third varied by at least ''1'' scale value, with the vast maj
ority resulting in comparatively higher ratings by the speech-language
pathologist. Conclusion: The findings of this study are in general ag
reement with previously published success rates for tracheoesophageal
puncture and attest to the long-term nature of these success rates in
a majority of patients. Additional investigation is necessary to ident
ify factors that may contribute to discrepancies between clinician exp
ectations and those of the patient or significant other. Copyright (C)
1998 by W.B. Saunders Company.