In 1996 the sale and export of food aid from refugee camps near Uvira,
Zaire, prompted a reduction in donated rations. However, research has
revealed that the sales did not reflect an excess of food in the camp
s. They were provoked by the absence of important components of the fo
od basket, by cultural aversion to the staple (maize) and oil provided
, by difficulties in food preparation, and by the refugees' limited ab
ility to diversify their diet and cover pressing non-food needs. Food
sales improved the micronutrient content of diets but at the expense o
f energy lost from an already energy-deficient diet. At most 23% of th
e refugee households were eating sufficient and adequate diets; the po
orest one-fifth of households were twice as likely to sell or exchange
food as were other households and their diets were the worst. These f
indings demonstrate the perils of the gap between policy and practice
in food aid distribution.