Fd. Mcglynn, COMMENTARY ON THE BATES ET-AL. REPORT ON EYE-MOVEMENT DESENSITIZATIONAND REPROCESSING (EMDR) - RESPONSE, Journal of anxiety disorders, 11(6), 1997, pp. 603-606
Lipke's criticisms of the experiment reported by Bates and colleagues
are without merit. Data from the experiment show either that the proce
dure was sound or that the clinical measurement reported by eye-moveme
nt densitization (EMD) therapists is suspect. Lipke's statement that E
MD enjoys increasing scientific support is likewise without merit. Sci
entific support for EMD seems to exist only when one disregards the me
thodological lessons taught by behavior-therapy research for the last
three decades. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.