COMMENTARY ON THE BATES ET-AL. REPORT ON EYE-MOVEMENT DESENSITIZATIONAND REPROCESSING (EMDR) - RESPONSE

Authors
Citation
Fd. Mcglynn, COMMENTARY ON THE BATES ET-AL. REPORT ON EYE-MOVEMENT DESENSITIZATIONAND REPROCESSING (EMDR) - RESPONSE, Journal of anxiety disorders, 11(6), 1997, pp. 603-606
Citations number
13
ISSN journal
08876185
Volume
11
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
603 - 606
Database
ISI
SICI code
0887-6185(1997)11:6<603:COTBER>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Lipke's criticisms of the experiment reported by Bates and colleagues are without merit. Data from the experiment show either that the proce dure was sound or that the clinical measurement reported by eye-moveme nt densitization (EMD) therapists is suspect. Lipke's statement that E MD enjoys increasing scientific support is likewise without merit. Sci entific support for EMD seems to exist only when one disregards the me thodological lessons taught by behavior-therapy research for the last three decades. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.