A. Supervia et al., PIROXICAM FAST-DISSOLVING DOSAGE FORM VS DICLOFENAC SODIUM IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE RENAL COLIC - A DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL, British Journal of Urology, 81(1), 1998, pp. 27-30
Objective To assess the possible therapeutic effect of 40 mg sublingua
l piroxicam (fast-dissolving dosage form, FDDF) compared with intramus
cular 75 mg diclofenac, as a reference drug, on acute renal colic in a
randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial, Patients and meth
ods Eighty patients were assigned to one of two treatment groups; one
received an intramuscular injection with 0.2 mL distilled water and tw
o sublingual tablets of 20 mg piroxicam FDDF, and the other received a
n intramuscular injection with 75 mg diclofenac sodium and two subling
ual tablets of placebo, Pain intensity was evaluated by the patient us
ing a visual analogue scale and by the observers, Vital signs at basel
ine and 30 min after the administration of the study drugs were also r
ecorded, Results The overall efficacy of the treatment was 81%; nine p
atients in the piroxicam and six in the diclofenac group (no significa
nt difference) required rescue treatment, Compared with baseline level
s, the pain relief was significant (P<0.001) at 30 min in both groups.
Twenty-two patients in the piroxicam and 25 in the diclofenac group a
ttained complete pain relief at 30 min, as evaluated by the observer i
no significant difference), Both treatments were similarly effective i
n decreasing vital signs, mainly systolic blood pressure, heart and re
spiratory rates, However, when the percentage change was compared betw
een the groups, piroxicam significantly decreased the respiratory rate
(P<0.03), Conclusion Piroxicam FDDF is as effective as parenteral dic
lofenac in emergency renal colic treatment, Furthermore, its ease of s
ell-administration increases patient compliance and potential use in g
eneral practice.