Rj. Olson et As. Crandall, SILICONE VERSUS POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE INTRAOCULAR LENSES WITH REGARDTO CAPSULAR OPACIFICATION, Ophthalmic surgery, 29(1), 1998, pp. 55-58
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a 3-year randomized tr
ial to compare silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs) with polymethylmetha
crylate (PMMA) IOLs, to determine any differences in laser capsulotomy
rates, capsular opacification light scatter, and subjective scoring.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 119 patients were enrolled, 84 of who
m were examined at 3 years. The authors designed a prospective, masked
, and randomized trial to compare the objective (lens opacity meter),
subjective (slit-lamp scoring), and clinical parameters of the posteri
or capsular opacification (PCO) of these patients. RESULTS: The silico
ne group had less PCO than the PMMA group, according to objective (8.6
% vs. 10.4%; P = .02, Student's t test) and subjective scoring (0.88 v
s. 1.79; P = .0001, Student's t test). The laser capsulotomy rate was
24% for the silicone group and 33% for the PMMA group; however, this d
ifference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The silicone
IOL was associated with less PCO than the PMMA IOL.