Purpose. The purpose of this study was to characterize the variability
of bulbar conjunctival staining over time in response to a single app
lication of fluorescein. Methods. Sixteen subjects were stained Monday
through Friday for a 2-week period. Appointments were scheduled from
9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. to minimize variance due to diurnal variation.
Fluorescein stain was applied by touching a separate Ful-Glo strip we
tted with nonpreserved saline to the lower palpebral conjunctiva of ea
ch eye, with the right eye being stained first. Immediately after appl
ication of the fluorescein, conjunctival staining was graded in a rand
omized order by two examiners, using cobalt blue illumination and a no
. 15 Wratten enhancement filter. Conjunctival staining was assessed ba
sed upon a 0 to 4 grading scale with 0.5 grade increments. By evaluati
ng the variability in staining over time for each subject, a represent
ation of overall fluctuation for the group was obtained. Results. The
average duration for an episode of staining graded higher than the gro
up median (grade 0.5) was found to be 2.0 +/- 2.4 days. Overall, a mea
n staining grade of 0.5 for the right eye and 0.6 for the left eye was
found. Right and left eyes were found to correlate well (r = 0.67, p
< 0.01, Spearman's correlation) and the mean difference was not statis
tically significant [p = 0.73, multi-way, repeated measures analysis o
f variance (ANOVA)]. The mean difference in grading between the two ex
aminers was 0.1 grades (p = 0.67, multi-way, repeated measures ANOVA),
with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.68 (p < 0.01, Spearman's corr
elation). Conclusions. Characterization of conjunctival staining over
time may be useful in evaluating clinically suspect staining, and in d
etermining its potential duration. The appearance and variability of t
he conjunctival staining patterns noted in this study indicate a poten
tial relationship to normal physiological processes, such as desquamat
ion. This study also demonstrated a low amount of variability between
right and left eyes, supporting the use of contralateral studies in th
e assessment of conjunctival staining. It also demonstrated a good con
sistency between separate examiners despite not being standardized.