Am. Bjorkqvist et al., COMPARISON OF DNA COPY NUMBER CHANGES IN MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA, ADENOCARCINOMA AND LARGE-CELL ANAPLASTIC CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG, British Journal of Cancer, 77(2), 1998, pp. 260-269
The differential diagnosis of mesothelioma, primary adenocarcinomas an
d pleural metastases frequently causes problems. We have used the comp
arative genomic hybridization (CGH) technique on 34 malignant mesothel
iomas and 30 primary lung carcinomas (adenocarcinoma, including bronch
oalveolar carcinoma and large-cell anaplastic carcinoma) to compare th
eir copy number changes and to evaluate the use of CGH to distinguish
between these two types of tumour. In mesothelioma, gains of genetic m
aterial occurred as frequently as losses, whereas gains predominated o
ver losses in carcinoma. In mesothelioma, the most frequent changes we
re losses in 4q, 6q and 14q and gains in 15q and 7p, whereas gains in
8q, 1q, 7p, 5p and 6p were the most common changes in carcinoma. Ampli
fication of KRAS2 was detected in two adenocarcinomas by Southern blot
analysis. CGH showed gains in 12p in the same tumours. Statistically
significant differences between the two types of tumour were detected
in chromosomes X, 1, 2p, 4, 8q, 10q, 12q, 14q, 15q and 18q. When compa
ring the frequency of gains and losses between mesothelioma and lung c
arcinoma using discriminant analysis, the sensitivity of CGH to differ
entiate mesotheliomas from lung carcinomas was 81% and the specificity
77%. The differences in DNA copy number changes between the two types
of tumour suggest that they are genetically different tumour entities
. Although CGH cannot be used as a definitive discriminatory method, w
e were able to distinguish between mesothelioma and lung carcinoma in
a large proportion of the abnormal cases.