RECRUITMENT OF SCLERACTINIAN CORALS IN THE SOLITARY-ISLANDS-MARINE-RESERVE, A HIGH-LATITUDE CORAL-DOMINATED COMMUNITY IN EASTERN AUSTRALIA

Citation
Vj. Harriott et Sa. Banks, RECRUITMENT OF SCLERACTINIAN CORALS IN THE SOLITARY-ISLANDS-MARINE-RESERVE, A HIGH-LATITUDE CORAL-DOMINATED COMMUNITY IN EASTERN AUSTRALIA, Marine ecology. Progress series, 123(1-3), 1995, pp. 155-161
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Marine & Freshwater Biology",Ecology
ISSN journal
01718630
Volume
123
Issue
1-3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
155 - 161
Database
ISI
SICI code
0171-8630(1995)123:1-3<155:ROSCIT>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The Solitary Islands Marine Reserve (30 degrees 18' S, 153 degrees 30' E) is the site of the southern-most extensive coral communities on co astal eastern Australia, It has been hypothesised that lack of success ful reproduction or recruitment of corals limits the distribution of c orals at high latitudes. In this study, coral recruitment patterns wer e examined for 4 locations within the Solitary Islands Marine Reserve, Hard coral recruitment rate at the Solitary Islands (6.7 recruits per plate pair) was less than rates reported from similar studies at both the Great Barrier Reef (44 to 242 recruits per tile pair) and at Lord Howe Island (48.5 recruits per tile pair). Recruitment was spatially variable both within and between locations, and there was seasonal and inter-annual variability in recruitment success at 1 site. Recruitmen t of hard corals was dominated by planulating species, consistent with predictions made from coral recruitment patterns at Lord Howe Island, and in contrast with most previous studies of Pacific reefs. At the 2 most offshore islands, coral cover was dominated by Acropora sp., but the density of acroporid recruits was extremely low, suggesting that this taxon may be reliant on sporadic recruitment from northern sites. In contrast with tropical sites where coral recruitment in shallow wa ter is most frequent on downward facing surfaces or crevices, corals s ettled abundantly on the upper-most surface of settlement plates at mo st sites. The difference in settlement orientation is possibly because of: (1) reduced light at high latitudes; (2) a reduction in herbivore abundance at high latitudes; (3) competition for settlement space on lower surfaces with abundant temperate species such as bryozoans and b arnacles.