Recent US court rulings have set the stage for a potential reduction i
n minority representation in the US House of Representatives from its
current historic highs. We believe that such a reduction is unacceptab
le, and strongly agree with Richard Morrill's recent contention in thi
s journal that political geographers should examine alternative method
s of maintaining current levels of minority representation. In this es
say, we argue that increasing the size of the US House of Representati
ves will provide the easiest method for maintaining current levels of
minority representation, while allowing for the creation of geagraphic
ally-meaningful election districts. We make this argument by (1) exami
ning the current debate over how members of the US House are elected,
(2) considering historical trends in the size of House constituencies
and comparing them to those of legislatures in other countries, and (3
) discussing how increasing the size of the House may lead to better q
uality representation. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reser
ved.