One of the outstanding results of three decades of laboratory market r
esearch is that under rather weak conditions prices and quantities in
competitive experimental markets converge to the competitive equilibri
um. Yet, the design of these experiments ruled out gift exchange or re
ciprocity motives, that is, subjects could not reciprocate for a gift.
This paper reports the results of experiments which do not rule out r
eciprocal interactions between buyers and sellers. Sellers have the op
portunity to choose quality levels which are above the levels enforcea
ble by buyers. In principle they can, therefore, reward buyers who off
er them high prices. Yet, such reciprocating behaviour lowers sellers'
monetary payoff and is, hence, not subgame perfect. The data reveal t
hat many sellers behave reciprocally. This generates a positive relati
on between prices and quality at the aggregate level which is anticipa
ted by the buyers. As a result, buyers are willing to pay prices which
are substantially above sellers' reservation prices. These results in
dicate that reciprocity motives may indeed be capable of driving a com
petitive experimental market permanently away from the competitive out
come. The data, therefore, support the gift exchange approach to the e
xplanation of involuntary unemployment. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.