Kt. Zondervan et al., THE PREVALENCE OF CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN IN WOMEN IN THE UNITED-KINGDOM - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 105(1), 1998, pp. 93-99
Objective To obtain a prevalence estimate for chronic pelvic pain in w
omen in the United Kingdom by analysing published data. Design Systema
tic review of published papers. Setting The general population or hosp
itals in the United Kingdom. Population Women participating in relevan
t community surveys or control women participating in hospital-based s
tudies. Methods Papers were retrieved by systematically searching the
databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycLit, and by hand searching. Studies
were included if they 1. were community-based and reported prevalence
rates of chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, or abdominal
pain, or 2. referred to a clinical population but reported prevalence
rates in a disease-free control group. Main outcome measures Prevalen
ce rates for chronic pelvic pain including any overlap with dyspareuni
a, dysmenorrhoea and abdominal pain. Results No community-based study
has been performed that provides an estimate of the prevalence of chro
nic pelvic pain in the general UK population. A rate of 39% was report
ed in women undergoing laparoscopy for sterilisation or investigation
of infertility in the single study from the United Kingdom investigati
ng chronic pelvic pain unrelated to menstruation or intercourse. Preva
lence rates for dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, and abdominal pain found i
n UK community-based studies were 8%, 45% to 97%, and 23% to 29%, resp
ectively, but definitions used varied greatly. Conclusions Because chr
onic pelvic pain can reduce the quality of life and general wellbeing,
there is a need for a community-based study into the prevalence of ch
ronic pelvic pain and its effect upon the lives of women in the UK.