Nj. Camp, GENOMEWIDE TRANSMISSION DISEQUILIBRIUM TESTING - CONSIDERATION OF THEGENOTYPIC RELATIVE RISKS AT DISEASE LOCI/, American journal of human genetics, 61(6), 1997, pp. 1424-1430
Genomewide association studies are set to become the tool of the futur
e for detection of small-effect genes in complex diseases. It will the
refore be necessary to calculate sufficient sample sizes with which to
perform them. In this paper I illustrate how to calculate the require
d number of families for general genotypic relative risks (GRRs). I sh
ow the superior sensitivity of the genomewide association study over t
he standard genomewide affected-sib-pair linkage analysis, for a range
of different underlying GRR patterns. I also illustrate the extent of
change in the sample sizes that is necessary for a genomewide associa
tion analysis depending on the pattern of the GRRs at the disease locu
s. In many cases, the comparative numbers of families required under d
ifferent genetic mechanisms vary by several orders of magnitude. These
sometimes dramatic differences have important implications for the de
termination of the size of the collection of samples prior to analysis
and for the types of effects that are likely-and unlikely-to be detec
ted by such an analysis.